🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Movement

In Europe, a rising chorus of nations are considering comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our children's innocence". Legislation is expected to be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential options under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has urged parliament to enact a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a related step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding motion calling for a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it warns of the "compulsive" design of these services, the move does not establish binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a useful first step," stated a leading European lawmaker driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a young person who died after viewing disturbing platform posts suggests that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are safe and age appropriate for minors," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, legislation is primarily happening at the state level due to national inaction.

• Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law capping minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further access requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills mandating adult authorization for minors to set up social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from some politicians to follow the Australian example, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Views

Apart from the West, further countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, world bodies adopt a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

As this international debate continues, the actions of this nation and others demonstrate that policymakers globally are no longer willing to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.